Loan Costs Increasing April 1, 2011

Starting April 1, 2011, loan-level pricing adjustments are increasing. Most conforming mortgage applicants will face higher loan costs.

Loan-level pricing adjustments are mandatory closing costs. They're assigned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and based on a loan's specific risk to Wall Street investors.

First constructed in April 2009, loan-level pricing adjustment are a means to help Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac compensate for "riskier loans" by bolstering their respective balance sheets.

Since the initial roll-out, Fannie and Freddie have amended adjustments five times. The pending April adjustment will be the 6th revision in two years.

No class of conforming borrower is exempt from LLPAs. Each loan delivered to Fannie Mae is subject to a quarter-percent "Adverse Market Delivery Charge". That cost is often absorbed by the lender.

The remaining adjustments are grouped by category:

1. Credit Score : Lower FICO scores carry bigger adjustments
2. Property Type : Multi-unit homes carry bigger adjustments
3. Occupancy : Investment properties carry bigger adjustments
4. Structure : Loans with subordinate financing may carry bigger adjustments
5. Equity : Loans will less than 25% equity carry bigger adjustments

LLPAs are cumulative. A borrower that triggers 4 different categories of risk must pay the costs associated with all four traits.

Loan-level pricing adjustments can be expensive -- as much as 3 percent of your loan size in dollar terms.  As an applicant, you can opt to pay these costs as a one-time cash payment at closing, or you can to pay them over time in the form of a higher mortgage rate. 

The loan-level pricing adjustment schedule is public. You can research your personal scenario at the Fannie Mae website. However, you may find the charts confusing. Especially with respect to which route makes the most sense for you -- paying the adjustments as cash, or paying them "in your mortgage rate".

Phone or email your loan officer for help.

Foods That Don't Belong In A Garbage Disposal

When a garbage disposal clogs, a plumber's service call in Encinitas can cost as much as $100 just for showing up. A "fix" could add even more to that bill.

To minimize the likelihood of costly repairs, therefore, be mindful of how your disposal works, and where its limitations lie.

Most clogs are the result of how certain food waste reacts with water and there's some items you should never flush down your sink. This is because everything sent through the disposal eventually must make its way down the waste line and that can include a trap.

Over time, the trap can get blocked.

With that in mind, here's a short list of food waste that's better suited for the garbage can than the kitchen sink:

• Rice and pasta : Small particles can never be completely pulverized, and will swell in the presence of water. This can clog pipes and traps.
• Egg shells : Tiny, granular waste can get "bound" with pipe sludge, creating a thick clog.
• Coffee grounds : Same as for egg shells. As a clog thickens, it's harder for water to pass through.
• Grease : Liquid fats turn to solid when in contact with cold water. Over time, this creates a clog like plaque on an artery.
• Potato peels : Once ground, peels turn starchy like mashed potatoes. This can clog a drain pipe instantly.

With kitchen garbage disposals, the general rule for flushing food should be "when in doubt, leave it out". Use your disposal for convenience, not for a trash chute substitute.

Why You Shouldn't Put Too Much Faith In October's Case-Shiller Index

The Case-Shiller Index posted awful numbers in its most recent reading. Each of the index's 20 tracked markets showed home price deterioration between September's and October's respective reports. Some markets fell as much as 2.9 percent.

The drop in values is nothing about which to panic, however. The Case-Shiller Index is just re-reporting what we already knew. It's a common theme with the Case-Shiller Index, actually; a trait traced to the report's methodology.

The Case-Shiller Index is an imperfect housing indicator with 3 inherent flaws.

The first flaw is that the index makes use of a limited data set, tracking values in just 20 cities nationwide. That data set is then projected across the more than 3,100 other municipalities in the United States. The "national figures", therefore, aren't really national.

The second flaw is that, even within the tracked 20 cities, not all home sales are included. The Case-Shiller Index only tracks sales of single-family, detached homes, and within that market subset, it only uses homes that are "repeat sales". This specifically excludes sales of condominiums and multi-family homes, and new construction.

Lastly, Case-Shiller Index's third flaw is its "age". The Case-Shiller Index reports on a 60-day delay, and the values it reports are tied to contracts written even longer ago.  Sales contracts from July and August are responsible for October's closings so when we see the Case-Shiller Index as reported in December, some of the data it's reporting is 5 months old already. That's too old to be relevant.

Looking back at 2010, housing was at its weakest between May and August. Therefore, it's no surprise that the most recent Case-Shiller Index shows significant weakness.  Looking forward, we should expect the report to improve -- especially because of how strong New Home Sales and Existing Home Sales have been since summer.

The Case-Shiller Index is helpful for economists and policy-makers. It's not much good for individual homeowners, however. For accurate, real-time housing data, talk to a real estate professional instead.